The AICPA administers the overall peer review program with the help
of local administering entities like the Peer Review Alliance (formerly
Illinois CPA Society Peer Review Program). The Peer Review Alliance
administers reviews for firms licensed in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Kentucky, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wisconsin not covered by
the AICPA. The program helps individuals and firms find qualified peer
reviewers, schedules reviews, and assists firms and reviewers with the
peer review process. The Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section below
includes more information about peer review.
Peer review is a systemic evaluation of a sole practitioner's or CPA firm's (hereinafter referred to as "firm") system of quality management over its accounting and auditing practice. It focuses on monitoring individuals' and firms' conformity with professional standards and is one of the self-regulatory tools used by the profession to protect the CPA hallmark and the public interest.
Peer review does not cover tax, consulting, investment advisory or other services.
Firms participate in peer review in order to meet individual membership requirements of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), state licensing requirements as well as Government Auditing Standards requirements (i.e., the "Yellow Book") if the firm performs engagements subject to Government Auditing Standards.
Yes. Firms that perform audits and/or examination level attestation engagements must undergo a system review. Firms that perform reviews or compilations are eligible for an engagement review, but may opt to have a system review.
In a system review, the peer reviewer tests all components of the firm's quality management system along with a representative sample of the firm's engagements, and issues an opinion regarding the design of and firm's compliance with its quality management system. Findings, if any, are written from a system perspective and may include reviewer recommendations and a firm response.
In an engagement review, the peer reviewer tests a limited number of engagements based on specific selection guidelines and reports all noted departures from professional standards. Findings, if any, are written from an engagement perspective and may include reviewer recommendations and a firm response.
Yes and no. Firms and sole practitioners may be required to allow their peer review results to be posted to the AICPA Public File as a condition of membership in the Governmental Audit Quality Center (GAQC), Employee Benefit Plan Audit Quality Center (EBPAQC), and/or Private Companies Practice Section (PCPS). Additionally, firms and sole practitioners may elect to voluntarily allow their results to be shared within this database. The peer review results of firms and sole practitioners that are not either members of the above or do not elect to share their results remain confidential.
However, the following general information is available for all enrolled firms and sole practitioners in the Firm Search section of the AICPA Public File:
More information related to the peer review program can be found on the AICPA's Peer Review website.