Inside Finance | Fall 2020
COVID-19’s Impact on Lease Accounting
In a turbulent market, lease modifications and concessions have become common but still require careful analysis.
Nancy Miller, CPA
Controller - UOP, Honeywell International Inc.
Navigating the Ins and Outs of Corporate Finance
One of the many consequences of the current economic environment has been an impact
on rental markets. The sudden slowdown has compelled many lessors to make concessions
to lessees whose ability to pay has been impacted. In many cases, lessors have made
amendments to existing leases that created rent holidays or lowered rents, often in
exchange for lease extensions, reduced space requirements, and even lease terminations—
which complicates the financial reporting of these deals. The FASB staff issued
a Q&A to
address some of the most pressing issues, but the broader perspective requires an
understanding of how the accounting for lease modifications under ASC 842 differs from
the accounting under the previous provisions of ASC 840 and how a lease modification
impacts transition accounting.
As a quick refresher, a lease modification is defined in ASC 842 as a change in the scope
of or consideration for a lease that was not part of the original terms and conditions of the
lease. A lease modification includes adding or terminating the right to use one or more
underlying assets or changing the contractual lease term. A modification is accounted as a
separate lease only if it creates a new right-of-use asset that is priced commensurate with
the cost of a stand-alone lease. Otherwise, the modification is a remeasurement of the
original right-of-use asset and lease obligation. Here are four of the major differences and
how to navigate them:
Transition Impact
ASC 842 included many provisions that were designed to facilitate the transition to
recognition of right-of-use assets by lessees. For example, lessees were permitted to
transition existing leases without revisiting the original determination whether the
arrangement is or contains a lease, the original lease classification, or the accounting for
initial direct costs. The discount rate for all leases could be effective as of the
implementation date.
However, none of that applies if the lease is modified or remeasured for any reason
(see
ASC 842-10-3-4). If a modification to the contractual terms and conditions occurs on
or after the effective date and the modification does not result in a separate contract or
the lessee is required to remeasure the lease liability for any reason, the lessee must
follow the requirements in ASC 842 from the effective date of the modification or the
remeasurement date.
Extensions or Terminations
Under ASC 840, most extensions were accounted for as a new
lease. Under ASC 842, an extension of the lease is not a new lease
but instead a remeasurement event for the existing right-of-use
asset and lease obligation. If the lease is extended, the lease liability
is remeasured with an adjustment to the right-of-use asset to
reflect the cost of additional rights. The new lease payments are
discounted at the lessee’s discretion using a revised appropriate
rate on the date of the modification. Any initial direct costs, lease
incentives, or other payments in connection with a modification are
accounted for as if the modification is a new lease.
Shortening a lease is also a remeasurement event. In order to qualify
as a partial termination, there should be a difference between the
rights before and after the modification. For example, a lease that
reduces the amount of space leased or the number of vehicles leased
would be a partial termination. On the other hand, a modification
that adds new leased assets would be accounted for as a new
lease—but only if the lease payments increase commensurate with
the standalone price for the additional rights of use.
Concessions
In normal times, a concession, such as a rent holiday or deferral,
would be accounted for as a modification and recognized over the
remaining lease term. As these are not normal times, the FASB staff
permits a concession due to COVID-19 to be accounted for as
contingent rent and recognized immediately. Also, if the concession
is not considered a modification, the transition provisions may still
apply, an extra incentive to account for the concession as
contingent rent. However, accounting for the concession as a
modification remains an option.
Impairment
The ongoing crisis is leading to extensive impairment testing of right-of-use assets, a new procedure under ASC 842. Under prior lease
guidance, only capital leases were recognized on statement of
financial position and therefore subject to the impairment guidance
in ASC 360. Now that virtually all leases are recognized, the new
right-of-use assets will need to be included in annual impairment
testing, whether individually or, more likely, as part of a larger group
of assets. For many companies, this will require additional staff time,
new skills, and the exercise of professional judgment to determine
asset groups, assess recoverability and, if necessary, determine the
fair value of asset groups and allocate amounts to right-of-use assets.
In addition, an unremarked provision of the new standard that was
added subsequent to the exposure draft requires a major change
in the accounting for operating leases once an impairment is
recognized. In effect, expense recognition is no longer straight-line.
Lease expense will be front-loaded for the remaining lease term,
comparable to a finance lease. The FASB did not include any
provision to revert to straight-line recognition if the lease is
extended, so presumably this accounting will continue through
extension periods.
The bottom line: Lease modifications or concessions driven by the
current crisis could have major impacts in current and future financial
reports and require careful analysis in order to get them right.
This column was co-authored by John Hepp, Ph.D., clinical assistant
professor of accountancy in the University of Illinois’ Geis School
of Business.